HireSprint vs factoHR (2026): The Brutal Indian HR Comparison
India-first comparison using listing signals: pricing visibility, compliance coverage, integrations, and verification freshness.
Brutal Truth (data-backed)
- 🏆 Where HireSprint wins: HireSprint holds a balanced profile for India teams; final call depends on your implementation reality.
- 🏆 Where factoHR wins: factoHR shows stronger statutory compliance depth for Indian payroll ops.
- ⚠️ The Brutal Truth: If statutory confidence and execution reliability are your top priority, bias toward factoHR. If you optimize for UI modernity and broader ecosystem flexibility, validate HireSprint deeply before finalizing.
| Metric | HireSprint | factoHR |
|---|---|---|
| HRSuggest Readiness Score™ | 45/100 | 74/100 |
| Vendor | HireSprint | factoHR |
| Pricing snapshot (India) | Estimated: quote-based (request vendor pricing by headcount, modules, and compliance scope). | Estimated: ₹40 to ₹90/user/month (depends on attendance + payroll scope) |
| India compliance depth | 4 tags: PF, ESI, PT, TDS | 9 tags: PF, ESI, PT, LWF, TDS, Form16, 24Q, Leave, Shifts |
| Integrations listed | Not listed | 3 |
⚠️ HireSprint dealbreakers
- • Pricing clarity is low (ask for base fee, per-user fee, and implementation fee in writing).
- • Integration visibility is weak (confirm attendance/accounting connectors and API limits).
- • Recent verification signal is missing (ask for latest product + compliance evidence).
🛑 factoHR dealbreakers
- • Feature breadth is strong, but process discipline is needed to avoid noisy configuration.
- • Pricing clarity is low (ask for base fee, per-user fee, and implementation fee in writing).
Related comparisons
Still confused?
Tell us your headcount and compliance needs — we’ll map the mathematical winner across payroll, HRMS, attendance, ATS, and performance workflows.